Topic on Talk:Huber Frumple

This is a permanent link to the first version of this post. You can view later versions on the post history page.

I know that there were conflicting ideas for the IRM for Huber Frumple. I was envisioning the traditional model that allows for different interpretations, but I know that some wanted to have one interpretation (two worms-on-string glued together) with the IRM used for different personalities.

It seems to me that there are different enough interpretations to recommended the first one, and if multiple IRM entries want to borrow the same template or introduction, it would be simple enough to copy and paste them.

The objection I've seen to this approach is that some fans want to see a single interpretation of a new player put for a consistent characterization. This seems unfair to people who weren't present for the creation of this characterization and wish to contribute their own interpretation. It also seems unnecessary, as, if the majority of members of a community prefer a certain interpretation, that will be the interpretation considered canon for that community. There are plenty of examples, such as Jessica Telephone and Henry Marshallow, where interpretations have varied in different communities without being reflected on the wiki. Ultimately, I think this space should be used for individuals or groups who want to share their versions of players, and, given that there is no "canon," the IRM should be open and available for any lore ideas. Please post your thoughts whether you agree or disagree so that we can move forward together with creating Huber's page.