Difference between revisions of "Talk:San Francisco Lovers/Archive"

From Blaseball Wiki

Tag: 2017 source edit
Tag: 2017 source edit
Line 17: Line 17:
  
 
"The Lovers' highly variable success from season to season could be attributed to their habit of regularly updating their uniforms, causing distractions." [[User:MEMANIAsama|MEMANIAsama]] ([[User talk:MEMANIAsama|talk]]) 02:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 
"The Lovers' highly variable success from season to season could be attributed to their habit of regularly updating their uniforms, causing distractions." [[User:MEMANIAsama|MEMANIAsama]] ([[User talk:MEMANIAsama|talk]]) 02:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Sandford Garner Lore Expansion ==
 +
 +
I'd like to change Sandford Garner's page to the following, building on his current lore:

Revision as of 20:39, 13 October 2020

Polycule

I'm no one of any "authority", as much as anyone could have any in a collaborative writing/fanon environment, not in the Discord or anything. But given the nature of the Lovers implied in the second paragraph (the roster is made up of Knight Urlacher's partners), I just want to note that it seems like a thorny situation when the potential for roster trades exist. As I'm writing this, the end of Season 3 is approaching, and that means blessings and decrees may shake up the team. In writing in reaction to this, I'm just hoping that people are careful with the pitfall of declaring "Because <player> is now on the team, they must be in a relationship with Knight" and the reason that's horrifying should be self-evident. Same for the inverse - "Kennedy Meh is now a Shoe Thief and Knight can no longer love them."

Most of what I've seen so far is chill and good, but I dread the possibility of The Discourse ending up being about this possibility.

Delayed response to this, but I think we've been pretty chill about this still... although there haven't been huge switch ups. I'm also not an expert on polycules or poly relationships but it's my understanding that we COULD reword that somehow if it makes people feel like there's some "forced relationship aspect". I think the way it's intended is that the polycule extends in many different directions and while maybe not all roads lead to Urlacher, Urlacher is found at the "heart" of this polycule and tying all these different personalities together, etc.
I do think this does bring up a valid point though that someday we'll get someone who isn't a character we can just go "Oh, they're dating a Lover now." without rustling feathers. So maybe it's worth discussing or having a plan in place?
EDIT:This is being discussed in Lovers discord, a simple rewording of the pagraph to imply the original formation of the team but that moving forward people aren't forced into relationships or broken up with or anything. Just to make it clear everyone is supportive of their team captain, whether in a relationship or a friend or whatever.

MEMANIAsama (talk) 02:03, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

"Odd Season BS"

For lack of a better title, it was discussed in the Lovers discord that we could come up with some lore reason why we have typically poor performance during Odd Seasons vs. Even Seasons. One suggestion was something about a change in uniforms. I think this could be added to the Trivia section with little to no issue. The suggested line was along something like...

"The Lovers' highly variable success from season to season could be attributed to their habit of regularly updating their uniforms, causing distractions." MEMANIAsama (talk) 02:05, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

Sandford Garner Lore Expansion

I'd like to change Sandford Garner's page to the following, building on his current lore: