Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Coffee Cup/Archive"
(Created page with "==Redundancy== I understand that it is probably a copy-and-pasted intro, but is it necessary to describe the Coffee Cup as "the Inaugural Coffee Cup between season 11 and se...") Tag: 2017 source edit |
m (Pitapot moved page Category talk:Coffee Cup to Category talk:Coffee Cup/Archive without leaving a redirect) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I understand that it is probably a copy-and-pasted intro, but is it necessary to describe the Coffee Cup as "the Inaugural Coffee Cup between season 11 and season 12" on all the team pages? it feels that this long description only belongs on the main Coffee Cup page, while simply "The Coffee Cup" will be fine for most references on other pages. If there are future Coffee Cups in the future, then we can use "The Inaugural" for specification, but there isn't a need for that distinction yet. The part about what falling between Seasons 11 and 12 is not needed anywhere but the main article, and I don't see any reason to repeat that every time it's mentioned elsewhere. I thus propose that we replace the long description with the short description on all pages save for the Coffee Cup main page. Is that acceptable to everyone? [[User:HailtheMicrophone|HailtheMicrophone]] ([[User talk:HailtheMicrophone|talk]]) 17:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC) | I understand that it is probably a copy-and-pasted intro, but is it necessary to describe the Coffee Cup as "the Inaugural Coffee Cup between season 11 and season 12" on all the team pages? it feels that this long description only belongs on the main Coffee Cup page, while simply "The Coffee Cup" will be fine for most references on other pages. If there are future Coffee Cups in the future, then we can use "The Inaugural" for specification, but there isn't a need for that distinction yet. The part about what falling between Seasons 11 and 12 is not needed anywhere but the main article, and I don't see any reason to repeat that every time it's mentioned elsewhere. I thus propose that we replace the long description with the short description on all pages save for the Coffee Cup main page. Is that acceptable to everyone? [[User:HailtheMicrophone|HailtheMicrophone]] ([[User talk:HailtheMicrophone|talk]]) 17:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :This phrasing is intentional; the routes that anyone would take to get to any given page is numerous, and we consider it important info to relay to readers. Should there be more Coffee Cups, then we can change the text to a more general introduction. [[User:BlaseballSteve|BlaseballSteve || Admin, Founder || Steven_#3235]] ([[User talk:BlaseballSteve|talk]]) 17:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 17:44, 30 November 2020
Redundancy
I understand that it is probably a copy-and-pasted intro, but is it necessary to describe the Coffee Cup as "the Inaugural Coffee Cup between season 11 and season 12" on all the team pages? it feels that this long description only belongs on the main Coffee Cup page, while simply "The Coffee Cup" will be fine for most references on other pages. If there are future Coffee Cups in the future, then we can use "The Inaugural" for specification, but there isn't a need for that distinction yet. The part about what falling between Seasons 11 and 12 is not needed anywhere but the main article, and I don't see any reason to repeat that every time it's mentioned elsewhere. I thus propose that we replace the long description with the short description on all pages save for the Coffee Cup main page. Is that acceptable to everyone? HailtheMicrophone (talk) 17:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
- This phrasing is intentional; the routes that anyone would take to get to any given page is numerous, and we consider it important info to relay to readers. Should there be more Coffee Cups, then we can change the text to a more general introduction. BlaseballSteve || Admin, Founder || Steven_#3235 (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
